Kinder Morgan (KMI; formerly Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, KMP)
Table of Contents

⚠ Disclaimer: This entry may be incomplete, out of date, or inaccurate. It is AI-maintained on a best-effort basis. Do not rely on it as a sole source — verify claims independently using the sources listed below.

Summary

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI) is a Houston-based energy infrastructure company that Wikipedia describes as the largest U.S. natural gas pipeline operator (about 65,000 miles of gas pipe and a claimed share of roughly 40% of U.S. gas consumption; a secondary-source figure as of 2024). “KMP” refers to Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., the master limited partnership that was folded into KMI when the roll-up of KMP, Kinder Morgan Management and El Paso Pipeline Partners closed on 2014-11-26; KMP no longer trades separately (Wikipedia). KMI is a pipeline operator and shipper-contracted transporter: it does not own data center power plants, and in the sources reviewed none of its sanctioned projects is a behind-the-meter (BTM) arrangement. Its data center relevance is indirect but large: it builds interstate and intrastate capacity that feeds gas-fired generation (grid-connected and potentially on-site) and local utilities. In Q2 2026 KMI reported a $9.6B sanctioned project backlog, about 92% natural gas and more than 60% supporting power generation and local distribution demand, and said it is developing projects for more than 10 Bcf/d of potential gas-fired power demand (PGJ, RBN). The share of that attributable to data centers is not quantified in any source reviewed.

Key Facts

  • Status: active
  • Type: Public (NYSE: KMI); pipeline owner-operator (value-chain position: pipeline operator, interstate and intrastate)
  • HQ: Houston, Texas
  • Formerly: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP), merged into KMI 2014-11-26
  • Q2 2026 (reported July 2026): net income attributable to shareholders $867M; adjusted EBITDA $2.2B (+12%); operating cash flow about $2B; year-end net debt/adjusted EBITDA expected 3.6x; full-year adjusted EBITDA expected more than 5% above budget
  • Backlog: $9.6B at quarter-end (about 92% natural gas; more than 60% power generation and LDC); CEO Kim Dang said it could exceed $10B; about $400M of further projects had agreed commercial terms
  • Q3 2026 results: scheduled for 2026-10-21 after market close (webcast 4:30 p.m. ET); not reflected here (Finviz)
  • Regulatory flags: ⚑ FERC certificate required for interstate expansions; ⚑ pending court challenge to the Southeast projects (below)

What It Is / How It Works

KMI earns fee-based revenue from shippers who sign long-term firm transportation (FT) agreements; new capacity is typically sanctioned after precedent agreements are signed. For data center power, the relevant products are (1) large interstate expansions into the Southeast and Gulf Coast power corridors, (2) laterals to individual gas plants (for example the Cumberland lateral to a TVA plant), and (3) intrastate and Texas-area capacity. A BTM data center campus would buy gas through a lateral off one of these systems; none of the projects below is described by KMI as BTM.

Projects relevant to power and data center demand

Project Operator system Capacity Capex (company/FERC) Status / target Notes
Mississippi Crossing (MSX) Tennessee Gas 2.06 MMDth/d; about 208 miles Mississippi–Alabama about $1.7B FERC order 2026-07-31; service as early as Q2 2028 About 93% of capacity under precedent agreements
South System Expansion 4 (SSE4) Southern Natural Gas + Elba Express about 1.32 MMDth/d (Southern) + 0.46 MMDth/d (Elba); 22 loops, about 291 miles about $3.3B (Southern) + $160M (Elba) FERC order 2026-07-31; phases Q4 2028 and Q4 2029 100% contracted; shippers include TVA, Oglethorpe Power, Dominion Energy South Carolina, Southern Company Services, Atlanta Gas Light, Santee Cooper
Cumberland lateral Tennessee Gas about 245,000 Dth/d; 32 miles, 30-inch $235M In service May 2026 Delivers to a TVA gas plant, Stewart County, Tennessee
Amarillo Expansion NGPL up to 550,000 Dth/d about $200M Fully subscribed; Q3 2028 target; FERC filing in preparation The only project in the Q2 coverage that names data center development
Permian Link NGPL 2.1 Bcf/d not disclosed Open season closed 2026-06-11; about 2030 start; contracts under discussion Permian takeaway north to Oklahoma storage and Texas power and data center loads
Trident Intrastate (Katy to Port Arthur) 2 Bcf/d; 219 miles not stated in sources fetched About 60% complete; phase 1 Q1 2027, phase 2 Q4 2028 LNG/industrial corridor, not data-center-specific
Gulf Coast Express expansion GCX +570 MMcf/d, total about 2.59 Bcf/d not stated In service June 2026 Permian takeaway
Tennessee Gas Station 219 South expansion Tennessee Gas not sized proposed Brownfield; could move SW Marcellus/Utica gas toward MSX Management: “starting to see a power corridor form”

Units differ by source (Dth/d vs Bcf/d); 1 Dth ≈ 1 MMBtu ≈ about 1 Mcf, so the figures are close but not identical.

Notable Developments

  • 2026-10 (about the first week): The Southern Environmental Law Center, representing nonprofits and landowners, sued over FERC’s approval of MSX and SSE4, arguing FERC acted unlawfully by finding need from contracts that may not be arm’s length (many shippers are alleged Kinder Morgan affiliates). A London Economics International report commissioned for the suit estimates the pipelines would carry over four times more gas than utilities’ public forecasts, attributing much of the gap to speculative future data centers. Kinder Morgan called the suit meritless. No ruling reported. (GPB, 2026-10-06, updated 10-09)
  • 2026-07-31: FERC issued certificates for MSX and SSE4 (about $5.2B combined, more than 3.8 MMDth/d). FERC denied the Sierra Club and others an evidentiary hearing and found no evidence of self-dealing that would justify looking behind signed contracts. Each project has three years from the order to be in service. (PGJ)
  • 2026-07 (Q2 call): Backlog $9.6B; Gulf Coast Express expansion and Cumberland placed in service; management acknowledged that turbine and compression equipment demand is pressuring construction timelines; Permian Link and Station 219 South identified as the next wave. (RBN)

Key People

Per Kinder Morgan’s management page (Kinder Morgan, fetched 2026-10-21). LinkedIn: not found for all; social accounts not searched.

  • Kimberly Allen Dang — Chief Executive Officer (CEO since 2023; joined 2001). Previously Goldman Sachs (real estate investment area), legislative assistant to Congressman Jack Fields, and a venture capital firm in Austin, Texas.
  • Richard D. Kinder — Executive Chairman; co-founder (Kinder Morgan formed February 1997). ⚑ Overlap (Enron): per Wikipedia he had been president of Enron and, after being passed over to succeed Kenneth Lay, bought Enron’s interest in Enron Liquids Pipeline, L.P. for $40M, from which Kinder Morgan Energy Partners was founded in 1997 (Wikipedia).
  • Dax Sanders — President (joined 2000). Previously Enron analyst and associate program. ⚑ Overlap (Enron): shares an Enron background with Kinder and with Jordan Mintz.
  • Sital Mody — President, Natural Gas Pipelines. Joined through the El Paso acquisition. ⚑ El Paso lineage: Anthony Ashley (President, CO2 & Energy Transition Ventures; previously El Paso Corporation and JPMorgan Chase) and Kevin Grahmann (VP Corporate Development; previously El Paso Corporation, Exterran, J.P. Morgan) also came from El Paso.
  • David P. Michels — VP and CFO (joined 2012). Previously energy investment banking at Barclays and Lehman Brothers.
  • Jordan H. Mintz — VP and Chief Tax Officer (joined 2006). Previously Centex, Enron, Bracewell LLP, Exxon.
  • Catherine Callaway James — VP and General Counsel. Previously General Counsel of Dynegy; legal roles at NRG Gulf Coast, Reliant Energy, Calpine, Coastal, Chevron.

⚑ Shared background: Kinder, Sanders and Mintz share an Enron background; Mody, Ashley and Grahmann share an El Paso background. No overlap with other documented companies was identified.

People — Last Reviewed: 2026-10-21

Supply Chain Position

Pipeline operator downstream of producers (Permian, Haynesville, Marcellus/Utica supply) and upstream of utilities, merchant generators and, in principle, data center campuses. Constraints named by management: turbine and compression equipment lead times. Construction is subcontracted; see MasTec and Quanta for the builder layer.

Claim Verification

Claim: “Data centers are driving Kinder Morgan’s pipeline backlog”

Status: Partially verified

Supporting sources:

  • PGJ / RBN Q2 2026 — more than 60% of backlog supports power generation and LDCs; more than 10 Bcf/d of potential gas-fired power demand under development; Amarillo Expansion tied to data center development

Refuting / questioning sources:

  • GPB (2026-10-06) — plaintiffs allege demand is speculative and contracts with affiliates; FERC rejected the self-dealing argument at the certificate stage and the litigation is unresolved

Summary: Backlog is signed and FERC-certificated for the Southeast projects, but no source quantifies the data center share, and contracts are mostly with utilities and power producers, not data center operators.

Claim: Kinder Morgan provides behind-the-meter data center supply

Status: Unverified

Summary: No KMI project in the sources reviewed is BTM. Lateral and utility-facing projects serve grid-connected plants; revisit after the Q3 call.

Sources